Some children spend hours every day on smartphones.
Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is currently ubiquitous that the time youth dedicate to utilizing portable devices is significantly increasing. This essay will discuss the justifications for this phenomenon and explain why this trend is more likely to be disadvantageous.
There are prime reasons for why young people incline to devote a huge figure of time to technological devices. First and foremost, children lack the attention from their parents. Adults who are overburdened tend to ignore the behavior of their offspring and let them free in using smartphones without management. As a result, minors cannot be aware of the extent to which considerable time is utilized and gradually spend most of their time on portable devices. In addition, this phenomenon is bred by the youth’s tremendous entertainment demand. Those are under immense pressure to perform well academically or to be introverted have a tendency to surf the Internet and play video games with the purpose to release detrimental energy in their free time.
However, some drawbacks may be derived from this trend. Firstly, this may lead to adverse effects on children’s health. The more time devoted to using smartphones the less physical activities they engage in which engender a variety of health conditions such as bone-related illnesses, eye diseases, or obesity. Moreover, it also triggers mild mental conditions related to anxiety and self-esteem or extreme ones related to dissociation and depression. Secondly, the greatly increasing in using technological devices can lead to a shortage of life skills. If children prioritize passively utilizing smartphones over active pastimes, they will not have a chance to experience various gripping challenges to improve their soft skills.
in conclusion, This phenomenon is engendered by less attention from parents and the rising minors’ entertainment demand. This result in negative impacts on children’s health and the development of life skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | Celina Pei | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | 123456abcxyz | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Elahe13 | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | hanifah | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantage 84
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
... experience various gripping challenges to improve their soft skills. in conclusion, This...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...allenges to improve their soft skills. in conclusion, This phenomenon is engender...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58862876254 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12754633342 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9949124897 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199002991236 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689202408451 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733380288825 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139152106597 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498336358793 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
... experience various gripping challenges to improve their soft skills. in conclusion, This...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...allenges to improve their soft skills. in conclusion, This phenomenon is engender...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58862876254 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12754633342 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9949124897 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199002991236 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689202408451 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733380288825 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139152106597 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498336358793 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.