In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the government should impose a higher tax on unhealthy food in order to reduce the health issues suffered by numerous people. This essay disagrees completely with this statement as imposing tax would not change people’s unawareness of healthy eating, moreover this action would affect people with lower incomes who have limited choices in unhealthy intakes
It has been identified that the habit of eating unhealthy food is based on many factors: the affordable prices of food; the accessibility of stores, the frequency of exercise and the awareness of healthy eating. Accordingly, it is the lack of concerns about having healthy diets and keeping fit that leads to the increase in health illness such as obesity or dyslipidemia.
Therefore, it is argued that levying tariffs on junk food would fail to tackle health problems that are not directly related to tax policy on food such as: raising people’s awareness of having beneficial intakes or adequate sleep and frequent exercise. In this regard, Canada is a prime example. Three years after tax was imposed on unhealthy food options, the consumption on these products dropped, yet the number of people suffering from obesity raised significantly higher.
In addition, imposing tax on a variety of food options may affect people with lower incomes. The absence of healthy food stuffs in so-called urban food deserts means that taxing junk food would disproportionally affect people living there. Accordingly, a survey conducted by the World Health Organization had shown that the combination of inaccessibility in poor countries and the widespread hunger leads to the purchase of food with low nutritious values from people with lower-average incomes.
In conclusion, junk food should not be subjected to taxes as this action of applying tax on fast food would not be able to tackle other problems related to the increase in health problems and the fact that this action might affect the impoverished
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for year between finishing high school and starting university studies What are the advantages and disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...poor countries and the widespread hunger leads to the purchase of food with low n...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nk food should not be subjected to taxes as this action of applying tax on fast ...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to taxes as this action of applying tax on fast food would not be able to ta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25552050473 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81114152852 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523659305994 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.37767623 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.6 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355863828056 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149750319775 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628970716255 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203982264311 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477351899839 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.