In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, University, or even after finding a job. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In multiple cultures, an increasing number of college graduates and working adults are making a conscious decision to live with their parents. While this trend has its benefits, they are eclipsed by the downsides, which will be proved in the following essay.
Discussing the possible gains of multigenerational dwelling, proponents of the trend first highlight the better care and emotional support made available between family members. Indeed, these manifest in various forms, ranging from joint preparation of daily meals, consultation in stressful times, and taking care of the ill. What is more, sharing living space with parents is likely an economical option, provided that payment for living expenses is properly contributed by each member. As an example, in cities such as Tokyo and New York, where living costs could be well above the salary of various jobs, many people must turn to their cars or other temporary shelters as they cannot afford rental fees. For this reason, staying with parents presents a sensible alternative, enabling young adults to establish their careers and achieve financial autonomy before a separate, independent life.
Having examined the aforementioned benefits, some pitfalls should be well understood. The most prominent, which stems from conflicting viewpoints and lifestyles, would be an uncomfortable life for all those concerned. For instance, parents may try to impose strict hierarchical rules on their children and trespass on their personal space. Likewise, young adults may introduce disturbance to familial routines for staying out late, skipping meals, and not helping out with household chores. In the long term, this can breed overly reliant adults lacking the crucial ability to individually resolve issues that is appreciated in the modern workplace. All of these problems can be negated by living separately. While financial concerns are acknowledged, living expenses could be shared with flatmates. Additionally, visiting parents’ place on a suitable basis is also a possible notion, as this can make maintain family ties and make each interaction more special and cherished.
In brief, while a family with both aging parents and young working adults has its merits, they are outweighed by the problems, which entail not only a low satisfaction level but also one’s regression away from individual independence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Taytor2609 | 81 | view |
| 2022-07-10 | xxlusubuxx | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-10 | xxlusubuxx | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-10 | xxlusubuxx | 67 | view |
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today How important are presentation and public speaking skills compared with various other work skills Which skill is the most important ability for most 84
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write What is the importance of learning to play a musical instrument for a child How important is it in comparison to the ability to read and write 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in brief, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60164835165 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85016450204 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9241477194 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21674836685 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647993214176 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466994266969 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132135943195 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179110781211 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.