In some countries, more and more people are being interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
In one or two countries. Numerous city-dwellers are intrigued to seek out the history of their surrounding house or building. One of the reasons is that they are extremely curious and get to know about the history of this house.
To commence with, it has been widely demonstrated that curiosity is instinctive for many people, hence, they may tend to find out or comprehend a lot of things that they do not know such as the history of the house or building. Only by grasping something related to their house such as happened events, or uncovered artifacts may you fulfill their curiosity. Additionally, they may desire to enhance their knowledge by discovering something tied to their house, aimed at narrating the historical plot for their descendants. In effect, for instance, my grandparents uncovered the artifacts in the garden, then he found out that in the war period, his house used to store weapons. As a result, the narrative is passed on to the younger generation as a good recollection.
How to research or figure out this? There are a lot of manners to glean such as the internet or inquiring about the history through grandparents or elderly people surrounding this area. For a start, people may study via the internet, fortunately, previous studies reveal some things that are valuable for their findings. Undoubtedly, the internet is a huge memory, people may detect anything. Furthermore, if people struggle to find out the history by the internet, there is a conventional way to study the subject which is traditional oral. This may be a comparatively quick way to grasp the history of the house or building through elderly people who is indigenous. Obviously, they spent a better part of their life there or they have lived there since they were born, so they have witnessed a lot of events in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 82
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 61
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationship Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9064516129 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87934443053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4431032617 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325981801279 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11132445518 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822182772891 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214450796822 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976227044203 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9064516129 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87934443053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4431032617 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325981801279 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11132445518 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822182772891 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214450796822 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976227044203 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.