Some people argue that arts such as music and paintings are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often debatable that spending money on social services is better than expending on arts and other cultural works. However, I disagree with the statement because all types of art are inevitable for the well-being of humans same as other services.
People who opposed art always think this would be a waste of money and can be diverted to the field of health, transport and other basic needs. For instance, many communities are suffered from diseases due to the unhygienic surroundings, and expensive medical treatments, many others face difficulties with inappropriate road and transport services. If the government would allocate money for this kind of problem would enhance the fundamental demands and thereby everyone could explore and entertain the world equally. Similarly, they argued that many arts need a huge amount of money to get an exact result and the benefits would be for some. for example, some paintings and sculptures require years to complete and requirements might be more expensive than the outcome.
On the other hand, there are many reasons behind the supporters of the arts. Firstly, arts like paintings and music helps the nation economically, culturally, and globally. In other words, many musical bands often celebrate other nationalities would exchange cultural values and it may mitigate the distance to other countries emotionally. Secondly, arts often enrich the financial status through tourism and globalisation both domestically and internationally. For example, paintings like last supper and Monalisa are familiar around the world and even now people are searching for original paintings. Finally, many kinds of music are helpful to reduce stress and music therapy is often useful for some treatment purposes. As a result, spending money on art would not be a pernicious outcome.
To sum up, it is controversial that spend money on the arts. In my perception, arts are often profitable to the public in many ways same as other public services, therefore, distribution of money for arts is not detrimental.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-18 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | MAHIR VHORA | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | MAHIR VHORA | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 38
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 77
- Many people believe that schools should teach children to become good citizens and workers rather than independent individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and relevant examples. 84
- The chart shows the source of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 73
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ult and the benefits would be for some. for example, some paintings and sculptures ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88807218517 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7002984073 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9375 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304208103048 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102368670514 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526574394933 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198741437845 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197151104745 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ult and the benefits would be for some. for example, some paintings and sculptures ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88807218517 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7002984073 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9375 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304208103048 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102368670514 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526574394933 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198741437845 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197151104745 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.