Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the amount of attention and resources given to wild animal protection is too much. I completely disagree with this opinion.
Firstly, the expansion of human activities is the reason why many animals lost their natural habitats. In order to produce more food to feed the growing population, many regions have been deforested to make room for farming. When people need more room for accommodation, people starts to reclaim land from rivers or even seas. Many animals have become victims as a result of these activities, so it is only fair and reasonable for human to shoulder the responsibility for protecting wild animals.
Besides, protecting animals is important for the survival of human as well. This is because when one species of animals, snakes, for example, dies out, the ecological system will be serious affected. Mice would probably destroy crops because of lacking natural enemies, leading to reduced food production.
In addition, the amount of money resources needed to deal with the problems of allowing the natural habitats together with the wild animals living there to disappear will be so much more than taking care of them now. For instance, rain forests are regarded as the lung of the Earth, absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen to balance the climate. If we turn a blind eye to this and these natural habitats of many animals for material gains, the resources and money needed to solve such problem would be billions.
In conclusion, animal protection requires as much attention and resources as we can give because that is our responsibility not only for animals but also for ourselves.
- Some people say that when dividing how taxes should be spent, the government should prioritize health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work while others think that it can be harmful for children What are the advantages and disadvantages of children doing paid work 81
- 1111 11
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government，while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12915129151 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67414405338 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583025830258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0620863739 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22770946104 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092171094504 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123657210047 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163715846931 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136076796173 0.056905535591 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.