Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones

Essay topics:

Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.

In this day and age, there has been debatable that whether parents shiuld let children to use their phone during the time the school age. While some people think that parents or teacher should hold children back from using their phones during the school day, others firmly believe that children should be permitted to use their phones. From my point of view, I think that children should be permitted to use phones at school.

On the one hand, there is a wide range of compelling reasons to explain why children should be prohibited to use their phone when they are at school. One evident strength is that phone is one of the factors to make children divert their attention. They can not highly focus on learning or solving tasks from teachers when they always keep their eyes glued to the screen of the phone. Therefore, it will diminish the productivity and effectiveness in children's learning quality. Case in point, a recent reasearch show that when interviewing some teachers in schools, they observe that the purpose of using phone of children is mainly to browse the web and chat with their friends instead of educational aim.

On the other hand, people who are in favor of children using phones in school for some reasons. Firstly, it is one of the efficient tools to help children learn better. They can use their phones to enrich their knowledge and draw a lot of meaningful lessons from their phones. For instance, children can use their phones with the view to learning english from foreign peoples, especially learning about cultures, history, customs of other nations on Youtube without teachers. In addition to that , phones also enable children to maintain their contact with significant people when they have to learn far from their family in several emergency circumstances happening to children. In constrast, without phone, parents can not update timely information of their children to support. So, it will cause some disadvantages for both children and parents.

In conclusion, Although it has some drawbacks when allowing children to use their phones at school, I entirely believe that there has numerous advantages when letting children use thier phones at school under strict control from teachers.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 RTroMT 78 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 84 view
2023-07-09 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-06-19 quang0612@1 61 view
2023-05-17 chesse 61 view
Essays by user chau ha :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of children is mainly to browse the web and chat with their friends instead of e...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople who are in favor of children using phones in school for some reasons. First...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... efficient tools to help children learn better. They can use their phones to enrich th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...be without teachers. In addition to that , phones also enable children to maintain...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49925040723 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491847826087 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5601799291 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.637331400202 0.244688304435 260% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244701933505 0.084324248473 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15657110117 0.0667982634062 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.445941962998 0.151304729494 295% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133263665523 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.