Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disgree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disgree?

Recently, the topic as to the tuition fees of higher education should whether be subsidized by the government or not has been gainning the public’s attention. Although this is not without benefits, I contend that, from my own perspective, the drawbacks would be far higher than ones that will be addressed below.
There are several compelling reasons why some subsribe to the idea of provision of free-of-charge education. First, due to the cost of entering university that is often prohibitively expensive, there are an enormous number of students who are the disadvantages find it incredibly hard to pay, leading to the chance of attending higher education which is almost over. In addition, in order to contribute to the thriving economy in the foreseeable future, which means that countries need to has an inordinate amount of educated workforce to meet the need of companies or authorities. Last but not least, it is clear that the criminal rate would be reduced if goverments agreed to guarentee that everyone has a right to have access to university by supporting the cost of higher education.
Despite the aforementioned advantages, I personally think that disadvantages would pale in comparision with previous ones. The first one we will easily realize that this will take a heavy toll on governments. The unevitable consequences, namely budget deficit ,tax hires even reduced welfare , will definetely things that need to take into account before thinking of making the tuition fees free for all individuals. Furthermore, there are a host of things that have to tackle immediately today, like supporting people who are finally disavantaged families or erecting contructions which are beneficial to the environment or the comperetive needs of people in their daily life, in light of their pivotal roles in modern society.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that the benefits have important roles in contributing to the development of nations, I would concur that the above drawbacks will do more harm than good.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-23 dorae 67 view
2023-08-19 dorae 67 view
2022-08-14 ThaoNguyen_1 67 view
2022-07-22 HANH DZUNG 73 view
2022-03-04 Toki1508 56 view
Essays by user hhh8080 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...ure, which means that countries need to has an inordinate amount of educated workfo...
^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...able consequences, namely budget deficit ,tax hires even reduced welfare , will de...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... deficit ,tax hires even reduced welfare , will definetely things that need to tak...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...l individuals. Furthermore, there are a host of things that have to tackle immediate...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25846153846 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05548727441 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596923076923 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.503888083 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.363636364 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5454545455 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157121615355 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514569605014 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449762661553 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802086679558 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359949808574 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.