Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the growth of the population, the demand for traveling is increasing sharply, so citizens pay much more attention to enhancing the quality of road infrastructure. There are those who opine that the authority should allocate money to constructing rail and metro lines, while others think building more highways is a greater way to mitigate the traffic jams. This essay will shed light on both approaches before making a final note.
To commence with that notion, there are some reasons why residents think building trains and railways is the better way to tackle the current problem. The first reason is that rail and metro lines operate in separated infrastructures and they are able to carry a large number of passengers, thus it will ease the pressure on road infrastructures. If people are encouraged to use public transportation, the issue of traffic jams that result from a large number of private vehicles will be mitigated. Another reason is that constructing the railway system can connect the traffic route between rural areas and urban areas easily. From that, the residents who settled down on the outskirts will be able to commute to work conveniently, and time-saving as well because of not migrating to the central city. This solution may decrease the considerable amount of private vehicles moving to the city.
On the other hand, building more highways allow higher transportation to move to stimulate during the rush hour, which avoids the congestion situation. Therefore, the traffic system is not only under the control of the authority, but also the safety of commuting is assurance. Moreover, this approach will meet the need of purchasing more personal vehicles. In addition, the highway systems of the regions are interconnected, the government can make policies to encourage cooperation by changing the branches into suburban areas, which will lead to reducing the population density. As a result, this also helps ease the traffic congestion. For instance, in the Long Khanh district of Dong Nai province, the local government has suggested expanding the current roads and building more highways in order to adapt to the need of the people. This system is completed and go into operation now.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that both sides of the argument have their positive points. However, I’m inclined to believe that the method to build trains and subways makes more sense in terms of environmental protection.
- To succeed in business one needs to learn and know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life 89
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rastructures and they are able to carry a large number of passengers, thus it will ease the press...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... issue of traffic jams that result from a large number of private vehicles will be mitigated. Ano...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20707070707 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8496084538 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5402907358 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271244882576 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681088413401 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596135673321 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149577668626 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226519640506 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rastructures and they are able to carry a large number of passengers, thus it will ease the press...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... issue of traffic jams that result from a large number of private vehicles will be mitigated. Ano...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20707070707 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8496084538 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5402907358 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271244882576 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681088413401 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596135673321 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149577668626 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226519640506 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.