Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned Others feel that we should be able to talk whenever we like Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned. Others feel that we should be able to talk whenever we like. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Banning phone calls at crowded place ought to be restrict accepted by few people. However, in contrast few opine in favour of calls at every place. According to me this argument need to be scrutinize before forming an opinion because emergency might be taken under consideration. This essay pertain both views with suitable examples.
In this fast pace world, when every individual are occupied with smart phones with proper internet connectivity hence having phone calls often is very common. But these unwanted calls could be bottleneck while discussing serious issues, theatres or attending business meetings or presentations. To illustrate, in theatres this may lead to distraction for public as well as performer too. This may cause to build a negative image in peers. Few theatres and halls have protocols that need to be followed while attending seminars and gatherings.
In some cases, when emergency taken into consideration, it is necessary to take calls at every place. This may lead to an accident if these calls are ignored. For instance, when an accident occurs it is requisite to ambulance driver to take calls wherever they are present. Otherwise this can put individual life in danger. Furthermore, It is imperative to follow the protocols but it is not essential to pick the call up when an emergency occurs. In addition, jammers are already installed at such places where calls are completely banned like in military base for security purpose.
To conclude, when gauging both views, it is requisite to take calls when emergency taken into consideration. However, in contrast, when unnecessary calls occur, masses ought to follow protocols because this may lead to distraction several times.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-10 thaiha123 67 view
2021-01-25 kd_-_77 56 view
2021-01-25 kd_-_77 73 view
2020-12-27 song12347 73 view
2020-10-10 Piyush Somani 61 view
Essays by user Piyush Somani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...pine in favour of calls at every place. According to me this argument need to be scrutinize bef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'pertains'.
Suggestion: pertains
...e taken under consideration. This essay pertain both views with suitable examples. In ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...s well as performer too. This may cause to build a negative image in peers. Few theatres...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le attending seminars and gatherings. In some cases, when emergency taken into...
^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...o take calls wherever they are present. Otherwise this can put individual life in danger....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... may lead to distraction several times.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26642335766 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80153411997 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0933990912 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8823529412 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121671663359 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440363652024 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467515124856 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082551221265 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626520248291 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.