Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, information can spread extremely fast thank to development of technology. There is a belief that scientific research, business and the academic information should better be shared as much as possible while others oppose this because of the importance and value of information. And I suppose that human can introduce information wisely by considering its value.
People could gain more knowledge than ever by observing a variety sources of information. For instance, citizens would stay up-to-date whether scientists found new elements or the stock's tendency moved upwards or downwards. Not to mention that information help remarkably to study process. A student who are carrying out a survey in business management use figures in the field of entrepreneurship.
On the other hand, some significant and valuable information is wisely not known by public. In other words, it is essential to keep the military's internal information secretly, therefore none of the enemies could break the country's peace. Moreover, corporations' contracts or management policies are not allowed to discuss outside the firms which lead to destruction and dropping profits.
In conclusion, although sharing information in specific field such as science, business or academy is beneficial for people, information need evaluating its value before publishing.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 84 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-02-06 MinyiChu 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stocks'' or 'stock's'?
Suggestion: stocks'; stock's
...er scientists found new elements or the stocks tendency moved upwards or downwards. No...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69651741294 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13435994614 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.686567164179 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4002962722 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274342873187 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088260568783 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888798692298 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147714303978 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731239140705 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stocks'' or 'stock's'?
Suggestion: stocks'; stock's
...er scientists found new elements or the stocks tendency moved upwards or downwards. No...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69651741294 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13435994614 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.686567164179 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4002962722 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274342873187 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088260568783 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888798692298 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147714303978 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731239140705 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.