Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The debate on whether information should be freely disseminated or shared with restrictions in the realms of scientific research, business, and academia is of considerable significance in our modern, knowledge-driven society. Advocates for the unrestricted sharing of knowledge argue that such openness is pivotal for the swift progression of these sectors. Open access allows a broader base of individuals to utilize and expand upon prior research, potentially leading to groundbreaking developments and expeditious progress in these fields.
Furthermore, the free exchange of information can significantly contribute to global prosperity. Developing nations, which may lack the financial capabilities to invest in extensive research or technology development, would greatly benefit from open access to important knowledge. This can help close the technological gap and enable these countries to utilize advanced technology and information, catalyzing their own development and integration into the global community.
Conversely, the stance for restricted access to information has its merits, especially in areas where research requires considerable resource investment. For instance, the field of medical research, which involves detailed studies and trials to develop treatments for complex diseases such as cancer, demands significant funding. Imposing a fee for access to this critical knowledge can incentivize researchers and offset the substantial costs incurred in the research process. However, it is crucial that such fees are not prohibitive, as this could lead to a monopolization of technology by wealthier nations or corporations, to the detriment of less affluent countries.
In conclusion, while there are numerous benefits to freely sharing information-including fostering development across various fields and promoting worldwide prosperity-the efforts and financial investments of researchers must not be overlooked. A balanced approach that appreciates the value of open access to information while respecting intellectual property rights in essential. Such an approach will encourage innovation and global collaboration, ensuring that the fruits of research are shared equitably.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Some people think personal happiness is closely related to economic success while others believe that it depends on other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23529411765 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50210325971 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630718954248 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9329319391 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.769230769 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155265114008 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580455761533 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436663401727 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999515179114 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464556408837 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.21 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.