Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
People have different views about the sharing of resources in specific fields of commerce, research, and learning. While some argue that it is beneficial to share more contents with the public, I personally believe this move possibly goes against the interest of academic institutions and Innovative Large Companies.
There are various reasons why people think that we should disclose their knowledge to the public. Firstly, they may assert that information is accessible freely can motivate related professional people to fully concentrate on the work. Scholars with more valuable knowledge and skills can have a deeper breakthrough in a short period of time. Another reason is that secret information cause panic, mistrust, and chaos in our society. Messages of Unknown flying objects and Zone 51 have been urban legends in America for a long time and people have kept judging for reality.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that we should protect the precious study not to open. In the first place, the researcher and high tech companies put a huge amount of time and unlimited working hours on innovating a product or a technical skill. Even multinational companies with a health financial level, they have to meet their basic running costs such as utilities, the salary of staffs, and rents. If the secret product or intelligence is open to the public when it is innovated, this would seriously demotivate high tech companies in our world. For instance, Apple hid the technical skill of smartphones and successfully smashed other companies in the past.
In conclusion, although it is might seem sensible for the public to access freely, I personally prefer to protect the interest of the creator first.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads 78
- 1234 11
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 10
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n have a deeper breakthrough in a short period of time. Another reason is that secret informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2238267148 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75712553088 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8884229859 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158144323718 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049410183149 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493176422019 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873007663401 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793091607851 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.