Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
The importance of sharing information, which has always been debatable, has now become more controversial. While many people claim that data should be accessible freely, others reject this notion. However, in my point of view, the second belief appears to be more rational. reasons are going to be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, the most rational justification about the first groups’ sights is that people, all over the world, undoubtedly expected to be up to date in their professions. In fact, it is crucially important for all workers to gain firsthand information freely and make progress in their job. Moreover, supporters of this current opinion argue that considering cost for information may not be affordable for the majority of people. For instance, teachers should explore new, challenging ways of homework, but their income is not much enough to procure data weekly.
On the other hand, others put forward the arguments against this belief. The main reason justifying their opinion is that financial support plays a vital role in some sort of information. As an example, researchers, working in laboratories, must provide ingredients for their experiments. So, their activity profoundly affected by financial issues; sales of their previous scientific discovery is incredibly essential for them to provide the cost of current research. Furthermore, there is a number of information which not only would be dangerous but also have limitations in users’ age. The best example of this idea is how to make a bomb.
In a nutshell, although there are a number of sights on both sides of this controversy, in my firm conviction, information should be divided into free and monetary based on their fields. As a matter of fact, considering payment to a special source of information would put limitations for access, or help them to improve.
- Some people believe that it is a good to share as much information as possible in scentific research bussiness and the academic world Other believe thar some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and giv 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 84
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compare with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reasons
...ond belief appears to be more rational. reasons are going to be discussed in this essay...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...current research. Furthermore, there is a number of information which not only would be dangerous but a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in fact, sort of, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95869903843 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8235054074 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162204721569 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495774122825 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281620252754 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945664099248 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133330372703 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.