Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
There is no denying that information plays an essential role in raising people’s knowledge and awareness in most fields of our life. Some people said that information can be shared as much as possible in some significant aspects like science, business whereas others debate that it is too precious to be share in public… These following evidence will support/ reinforce my viewpoint.
It is believed that some kinds of information can be publicly shared due to the popularity of searching tools worldwide and other social medias such as Facebook, YouTube. These tools contain a huge amount of knowledge, for instance, we can find thousands of results on Google in just one click. Most of findings are related to a wide range of topics or issues going on in our life or invented by scientists and experts about things in ancient time that we cannot witness. Moreover, various sources of knowledge can be discovered in some communal places like learning resource centers, synonymous, the libraries in university. These resources are displayed to meet the self-study demand of students’ in some ways. Additionally, public information about health is widely mentioned on some forms of communications in order to remind people how to prevent themselves from dangerous diseases as well as own a good and healthy life.
However, some information are too valuable to be freely shown in society. For example, new inventions or research that help solve several problems happening to the Earth right now and have essential impacts on our living. These information should be protected by copyright and intellectual property right because of the amount of money or awards that inventors can received and the changes that bring to mankind. I still remember a story of stealing other ideas and effort that led to the death of the boy. That boy and another girl work together in a project to create a “stroke detector”, conversely, that girl gave up in half way of the study. The boy followed his dream because he has had history of stroke before. Finally, he succeeded in the research but forgot to change the email password, then the girl stole all project documents and achieve a scholarship to live and study in Japan. Few days later, he had a stroke and passed away.
In summary, everything should be shared in public but in moderation according the level of crucial of the information because of copyright and even human lives.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hare in public… These following evidence will support/ reinforce my viewpoint. I...
^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the findings') or simply say ''Most findings''.
Suggestion: Most of the findings; Most findings
...of results on Google in just one click. Most of findings are related to a wide range of topics o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'These informations'?
Suggestion: This information; These informations
...d have essential impacts on our living. These information should be protected by copyright and in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01732673267 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121239534 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8480226197 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.235294118 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338296747732 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921045427319 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119240045552 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196770989504 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924426817014 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hare in public… These following evidence will support/ reinforce my viewpoint. I...
^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the findings') or simply say ''Most findings''.
Suggestion: Most of the findings; Most findings
...of results on Google in just one click. Most of findings are related to a wide range of topics o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'These informations'?
Suggestion: This information; These informations
...d have essential impacts on our living. These information should be protected by copyright and in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01732673267 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121239534 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8480226197 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.235294118 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338296747732 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921045427319 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119240045552 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196770989504 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924426817014 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.