Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
During the age of information, a new heated debate was raised. While some people hold the view that information should be distributed widely and up to the hilt, others defend that some pieces of information are extremely valuable and relevant to be accessed without any form restriction. Both perspective have reasonable explanations. Personally, I tend to agree with second point of view.
Some people argue that information should remain unrestricted due its significance. They say that citizens are entitled to understand and monitor how scientific researches have been carried out, how is the financial health of one company is progressing, and also which kind of disciplines are taught in academic environment. Studies prove that institutions which value information transparency and cooperation are more trustworthy to society in general.
Others defend that information is too costly to be produced to be in public domain. Many companies invest their private funds in research and development to come up a new product or solution, looking forward to achieving not only a market share, but also to making them more cost-effective. According to researches, disclosing details about goods and services, with no limit, facilitates piracy and could jeopardize the business profitability.
In conclusion, both points of view put forward valid arguments. On the one hand, sharing all possible information provides to society knowledge, as well as valuable tool of inspection. On the other hand, to reveal database without regulation can put in risk the financial health organizations. From my perspective, the second point of view outshines the first one thanks to the fact that, as long as companies put efforts to conduct researches the results has to economically viable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The society would be benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose an can even damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely.Discuss both views and give your ow 70
- Some schools require each student to participate in an organized school sport chosen by the students People at these schools argue that athletics is an important part of the educational experience and that there should be a rule requiring participation Ot 87
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages 45
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 67
Comments
I realized that you have
I realized that you have issues on conclusion. It is like introduction. There are some essays by top users with good conclusions that you can follow:
http://www.testbig.com/users/mabick1527
http://www.testbig.com/users/sfaht1
http://www.testbig.com/users/mrmo2610
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... any form restriction. Both perspective have reasonable explanations. Personally, I ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in general, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49454545455 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16680301287 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0052612633 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264438286757 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734251455316 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589769602565 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139660641133 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249619025987 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.