some people believe that it's good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today’s wide world has tremendrous advancements, as people are just one click away from obtaining information from any part of the globe. One set of people think, knowledge obtained from the fields of scientific research, business, and academics are worth sharing. Whereas, others oppose this belief and consider certain information are crucial and vital, hence sharing it without any restrictions is not advised by them. The following paragraph tries to address both views.
On the one hand, many people put forth an argument saying if scientists and schloars in the past refused to share details of their innovations, we might not be enjoying today’s sophesticated lifestyle. Hence they claim sharing essential information about research, finance, and academic advancements will definitely inspire millions of youngsters to learn and engage themselves. Thus paving way for growth in the society as well as the world.
Conversly, some consider information are vital resources and availability of such resources freely should be decided by the person or the company or the government to whom it belongs.A good example for this is, during the world war 2, The United States assigned scientist to create a nuclear bomb in order to counteract its enemies, if such distructive plans ever get into the hands of the fascists countries, future would have been unpredicatable. In addition to this, financial tactics of a country shall not be shared to rival countries, as they may take advantage and try to manipulate the stock markets and causing devious effects on their economy.
To conclude, I believe sharing knowledge on particular fields may be beneficial for the human kind, however if sharing such knowledge puts other countries at risk in terms of safety it is completely not advisable.
- the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after a refurbishment summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- in the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want in online without paying to what extent do you agree or disagree to that statement 78
- some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- some people say the only reason to learn a foreign language in order to travel or work in a foreign country Others say these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language discuss both views and provide your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to share details of their innovations, we might not be enjoying today’s sophest...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...joying today’s sophesticated lifestyle. Hence they claim sharing essential informatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...ny or the government to whom it belongs.A good example for this is, during the wo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32280701754 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89072555674 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659649122807 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.542288094 49.4020404114 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.7 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253700579851 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836104137528 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347173249132 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137425318899 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167622967276 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.