Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion

To considerate current scenario, tourism industry is expanded due to growth of tourism; certain argue that tourism should be banned to preserve native culture in some restrict areas while other opine that modification is essential and preventing tourism will not be beneficial. As per my perspective, to certain extent, it appears to be reasonable that will be discussed in ensuing paragraphs.

To begin, there are several measures which are support in protecting of tourism that could be put forth. The first and foremost one is that conflicts. To explain, the phenomenon of international tourism make conflicts between people habits and costume; as a result, local residents might get hurt. Not only that but also, sometimes sentiments of community get affected. In other words, tourists don't respect hosts's cultures because they don't understand their regulations. For example, in India, one can be seen it rarely that tourist wear shoes in campus of temple which is not rational. Ultimately, they break local rituals. What is more, certain heritage of local history which is precious for there residents, get damaged by tourist. Hence, due to tourism, people have to endure some things.

on a contrary, several factors which make tourism enrich. People may have a chance to learn about different culture like music, language, and spiritual things of several national by visiting various places. In addition, growth of local business at certain places get increased because of popularity of that places. As a consequence, one can be employed there, easily; therefore, economy of that areas can be rise, rapidly. Thus, tourist industry can be benefited by tourism.

To recapitulate, brighter side of tourism reduces disparity and distance between nation around the world; whereas, darken side needs to be accessed carefully.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-17 nhanluu79462 78 view
2021-10-10 gianggiangvn 89 view
2021-07-24 bikram12 56 view
2021-07-03 DQDang 89 view
2020-08-26 satyam mangroliya 89 view
Essays by user satyam mangroliya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... get affected. In other words, tourists dont respect hostss cultures because they do...
^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nt respect hostss cultures because they dont understand their regulations. For examp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
..., people have to endure some things. on a contrary, several factors which make ...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h make tourism enrich. People may have a chance to learn about different culture ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in other words, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.393728223 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7443044891 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9072390408 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0588235294 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322252855084 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876791213798 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834325615411 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186888847792 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081397031423 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.