Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Undoudtedly, protect the culture and nature is the duty of every citizen. Although some people think that the tourism is the reson behing the harm of culture and it should be ristricted in some ecotourism areas while others believe that it is worth to raise ban tourists in such areas. both the views will be discuss.

Firstly, If government restrict the entry of tourist in some areas then their culture will be more protected as surely, Because it is manufasted by a survey that the people residing nearby any tourism place are much effected by the visitors, they complaining about their mid night parties with alcohol drinks are raising the crimes and effecting the image of them in society.

On the other hand, some believes that it is unnecessary to raise restrictions among tourism, As it creates the employment and occupation over there. moreover most of the local people's earning depends on the visitors. For instance, people earn money by sell some attires and accomodations to the tourists as well as some transform their home into hotel on the rent basis. As it is clear that it improves the living quality of the local society too.

To conclude, some visitors ruin the culture of local residents while some raise the occupation for them, so restriction among the entry of tourists is not a good decision, local government should bann the activities that destroyes the beauty and culture of that spot and raise the fine amount on those culprits could be more benefitted.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-17 nhanluu79462 78 view
2021-10-10 gianggiangvn 89 view
2021-07-24 bikram12 56 view
2021-07-03 DQDang 89 view
2020-08-26 satyam mangroliya 89 view
Essays by user bikram12 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...th to raise ban tourists in such areas. both the views will be discuss. Firstly, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...e employment and occupation over there. moreover most of the local peoples earning depen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: moreover,
...e employment and occupation over there. moreover most of the local peoples earning depen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...heir home into hotel on the rent basis. As it is clear that it improves the living...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53599372482 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.378603832 49.4020404114 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358453457827 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144623630403 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938310973288 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224999939123 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114780668355 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.