Some people believe that reading books are better than watching TV or playing computer games for children to what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that reading books are better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is a well said that "today's children are leaders of tomorrow". Presently, some proportion of masses assert that reading books are beneficial for juveniles as compared to playing computer games or watching television. Here, I would like to Accord with the given statement.

A bunch of points can be mentioned to support my point of view. First and foremost, reading books are instrumental in enhancing offsprings imagination Power. To elucidate, peoples are expected to imagine the given text while reading books and it plays a phenomenal role in sharpening the mental abilities of Juveniles. Moreover, the role of reading books is terrific to increase the concentration power as they have to properly concentrate on the given content to understand it. On the other side, availability of several kind of games on computer and television create disturbance for teenagers to concentrate on study. Therefore, reading books holds more advantages for children rather than watching TV or playing games.

Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially, reading books help pupils to improve their reading skills. For example, as numerous stories are given in their mother language and it assist the children to learn vocabulary. Besides this, children can get enormous knowledge related to particular language. It is apparently seen that, the benefits of reading books are more as compared to playing computer games and television.

To recapitulate, undeniably television and computer games are stupendous source of amusemen. However, I still believe, the merits of reading books cannot be underestimated.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-07 Phuong1810 73 view
2023-08-30 ophongcute@gmail.com 84 view
2023-08-01 dieulinhxinhgai 73 view
2023-07-25 pwlihnkt 84 view
2023-03-18 bepmy2992004 67 view
Essays by user jasu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is a well said that 'todays children are leaders of tom...
^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'several kinds'.
Suggestion: several kinds
... it. On the other side, availability of several kind of games on computer and television cre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...r than watching TV or playing games. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...e given in their mother language and it assist the children to learn vocabulary. Besid...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... the benefits of reading books are more as compared to playing computer games and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52610441767 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07341502325 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8552913433 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335584918794 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100290527336 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922888033769 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196773792519 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475384276954 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.