Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a contentious argument over whether youngsters must do community
Jobs or not. Some people argue that it is beneficial for both society and youngsters. This essay will examine this debate from both points of view and then explain why its advantages outweigh its drawbacks.
There are numerous benefits in making the younger generation do some community work. The most obvious one is developing a sense of responsibility. In this case, they have to take care of some tasks on a regular basis. For instance, when a teenager is given the responsibility of shopping for an elder one, she or he understands the daily life of the care receiver is dependent on their task accomplishment. Otherwise, there will be some
serious consequences. The second positive result of compulsory community
work can be a healthier society. In this way, almost everyone is taking part in helping each other. No one will feel lonely because they are being accompanied by young ones. The young generation is acquiring the required
skills and experiences through contributing to social tasks. Adults find more free time to take of their own business.
As a result, everyone is content and happy. Some other people believe this type of work must be done voluntarily. Otherwise, the teenager may develop hatred. This is because community works are boring in nature and are not
age-appropriate for teenagers. If teenagers are made to participate in this type of program against their will, they may develop bad feelings and in a later
stages of their lives, they may hesitate to play a role in community works.
In conclusion, I tend to believe both arguments have their own merits. On balance, however, I believe teenagers must be given various responsibilities including community work, in this way we possibly have a healthier society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-21 | shwetarani | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | tmai41587 | view | |
| 2023-02-05 | katyhot1 | view | |
| 2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 67
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 67
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 67
- Cutting down forests is a real environmental threat yet this is still happening at a great rate around the world Why do you think forests are being destroyed Are there any benefits from the destructions of forests 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y works are boring in nature and are not age-appropriate for teenagers. If teenag...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11333333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95259584471 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5597004122 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.38176352705 228% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346385103332 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933784893253 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702436793118 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128474031658 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612945951737 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.