As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Traffic jams and high price of housing are common problems at metropolis. Companies, therefore, are motivated to re-locate their operation to less developed regions. I believe that the merits from the development would outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, the movement not only benefits the businesses but also have positive implications on the well-being of many people. It is obvious that firms can lower their operational expenditure since the expenses at rural areas are cheaper than urban places. From the workers' perspectives, when firms move to countrysides, their workforce is likely to move with them. When settling at rural areas, the newcomers will experience better environment due to less pollution caused by traffic jams as well as lower living costs. More importantly, as a large number of workers leave cities, their pressure on the areas will be ameliorated. As a result, the city dwellers who remained at the metropolitan areas will be beneficial with less congestion, and have a chance to purchase or rent more affordable accommodations.
On the other hand, there are several issues associated with companies' relocation in remote places. First, the economic organizations have to deal with insufficient imfrastructure and facilities, including road systems, energy and water supplies. Another downside is that businesses are likely to encounter shortage of workers.
This stems from the fact that people have a tendency to flock to major cities for employent opportunities, thereby the companies may find it difficult to recruit new employees at the remote areas. However, these shortage of the necessary resources and manpower will soon be enhanced over the years as industrialization and urbanization will lead to the development of relevant constructions and attract valuable human resources. Thus, the disadvantages will be tackled in years to come.
In sum, I concur with the view that the movement of businesses away from cities will have more good than harm. The phenomenon will benefit both companies, their staff, and the people who are city inhabitants. Nevertheless, these companies may initially struggle with difficulties, but these issues are not chronic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-08 | Le Van | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | thuydng1909 | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-11 | ojehparvaz | 78 | view |
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 47
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- News coverage about violent crimes frightens people and encourages criminals Therefore some believe that this type of news should not be reported in newspapers or shown on TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many students around the world don t choose science subjects at university Give the reasons for this and describe the impact on the community 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ower living costs. More importantly, as a large number of workers leave cities, their pressure on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 207, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this shortage' or 'these shortages'?
Suggestion: this shortage; these shortages
...employees at the remote areas. However, these shortage of the necessary resources and manpower...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49411764706 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09260195486 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579411764706 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6616912652 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109776367732 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346286248244 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246935839895 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530693792961 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313061944303 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.