Some people prefer to buy local products while others prefer international products. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the booming rate of economic developments, there are two opposing standpoints of consumers, one particularly prefer domestic merchandises, while other believe that international brands are more beneficial, in relating to customer’s preference. This essay will argue how maximizing the use of local produce can bring more to the table.
First of all, there is no doubt about what continental companies can offer, especially product variety and availability to suit the need of every customers. Take supermarkets and mega malls for example, providing numerous selection of fully stocked commodities, from high-end clothing lines to exotic fruits from all corners of the world. But most of the time, these products are heavily taxed, hence the hefty price tag. Besides a wide range of choice, consumers are more likely to gravitate toward foreign brands due to their popularity, which is not necessarily a good thing. Apple could be seen as an exemplar, since every new model of their products are all purchased before hitting the shelves. Although most Chinese consumers believed that it is a social norm to own Apple’s devices, there is no need to have the latest model as a status symbol.
On the other spectrum, however, patriotic consumers are more comfortable with choosing to support the local’s market, while creating more jobs opportunities for their inhabitants. To explain this, these people believe that verified sources of valued produce, ranging from artisan baked goods and wines to seasonal fruits and vegetables, could not be found elsewhere outside their region, which is more preferable than frozen or canned food in supermarket chains. Along with that, a great number of locals can also get a well-paid job in their own town. But that is just the tip of the iceberg, since promoting and patronizing local business can also raise awareness of the native culture and cuisine. In particular, the Vietnamese’s iconic staple Banh Mi from street vendors can outweigh Mac Donald’s fast-food chain anytime with outstanding locally sourced ingredients and a rock-bottom price.
In conclusion, I concur with the idea of developing the socioeconomic state of a region by endorsing their business would ultimately bring positive effects in the long run, which is keeping local businesses from running out and provide a stable growth for the entire society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-21 | tthonghanh | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | bilalm474 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | 0102mickey | 96 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 67
- some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. others, however, believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. in your opinion, do the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? 84
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 61
- Some people prefer to buy local products while others prefer international products To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG[1]
Message: Use simply 'comfortable choosing'.
Suggestion: comfortable choosing
..., however, patriotic consumers are more comfortable with choosing to support the local's market, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38031914894 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94450208342 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2936547743 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118572074229 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385106063408 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348763638625 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706621980598 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422516401086 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.