Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of history education has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that more emphasis should be placed on history as a school subject than science and technology, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the latter stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that teaching history should take precedence over science and technology do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that students are able to learn our ancestors' misbehaviour, preventing human beings from committing the same mistakes that happened in the past, such as imperialism and colonisation. Furthermore, people have to take responsibility for bequeathing history to future generations given that not only can they have patriotism, but they are also able to feel a sense of belonging to society.
My opinion, however, is that teenagers benefit a lot more from studying science and technology. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that graduates who majored in science and technology are more likely to find well-paying and prestigious employment opportunities with greater ease because they are more in demand in the job market in this technologically-advanced era. In addition, having a tight grasp of huge amounts of knowledge related to science and technology makes it possible for mankind to devise groundbreaking solutions to numerous contemporary issues that humans face, exerting a positive influence on both individuals and society. As an illustration, science and technology can alleviate the impact of climate change, lessen global hunger, and save lives, which results in people having an improved standard of living. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that educating pupils about science and technology should be a priority for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 67
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- An interesting number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that educatin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40729483283 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11324256455 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2982445428 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279318275933 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864135593252 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714724584014 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1573812348 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867681324999 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.