Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish. Others, however, argue that it has only made people busier.
Does technology have made us busy rather than help us to get work done? Well, it has taken a share in corporation techniques and strategies by providing accuracy and efficiency, and flexibility in the workplace. And it has helped engineers and workers to solve equations accurately compared to human minds. However, the most cultured intellects have not yet been convinced that it has not chained our minds and they believe that it has made us busier than before the crack of dawn of it. This essay will discuss those two various points of view and gives support and examples.
Firstly, the word technology comes from those two Greek words, ‘techne’ and ‘logos’. So, technology has made our lives easier and it has reduced the effort and time required to complete a task. Moreover, technology has played a vital role especially, during the COVID-19 breakdown period. Secondly, it has changed the life of labor for the best by stopping them from relying on their physical strength to get their needs and replacing it with one-click machines. Scientists and ministers of the industry have gathered to announce a fully funded strategy to develop industrial production techniques by depending on machines. Although this lighting path they have been through was blessed by honors, it has brought double-edged consequences. Thirdly, the positive results were for delighted employers by decreasing the number of workers nevertheless replacing them with machines. And in consequence, decreasing wages is legally binding, or releasing all of them. In addition to the above-mentioned inform them to acclimatize to the new conditions of work or get fired.
There is a glimpse of the other point of view from the cultured and thus has risen since the invasion of technology when it had passed the limits of the workplace and its standards and has full domination of our society and liberty. In addition, this production as long as it has helped and still helping nations to develop and to get to the developed ones can also be considered a highly risky weapon that great nations can use to exploit or change situations that they want.
Finally, the feedback given above illustrates why technology is a good path for employers and nations and vice versa for employees. Even though there are opposing teams against those who would find and support any initiatives to stop the spread of technology in workplaces from stealing their jobs and time, freedom of expression. In a nutshell, technology has been identified as a double-edged weapon. Each nation has the lawful right to use it for its good.
In my point of view, the technological way of work has helped the professions a lot precisely the medical community by making it easier and has provided abridged ways of learning and getting experience.
- The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 78
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972and 2012
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f view and gives support and examples. Firstly, the word technology comes from ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e new conditions of work or get fired. There is a glimpse of the other point of...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t or change situations that they want. Finally, the feedback given above illust...
^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, freedom of expression. In a nutshell, technology has been identified as a doub...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lawful right to use it for its good. In my point of view, the technological w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 10.4138276553 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 462.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07792207792 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84488384076 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554112554113 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4682816524 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122197712806 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338548335874 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397665487751 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686203892385 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209793700688 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.