Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give own opinion.
In recent years, there are a host of issues like water contamination, ozone depletion, and so on. These impacts take a heavy toll on the planet so that we are responsible to alleviate environmental problems. However, some individuals think that environmental conservation rests with state officials. Other schools of thought that humans play a role in reversing the damage done to the planet. As far as I am concerned, not only the government but also ordinary citizens are responsible for environmental quality protection.
On the one hand, there are convincing reasons that the government has a vital responsibility for conservation projects. First and foremost, there are a bulk of non-biodegradable products consumed every year, which is the main reason for overloading landfills. The government can empower citizens to do targets such as recycling and reusing, which is the way that decreases the amount of waste garbage. Besides that, environmental campaigns are not effectuated without government intervention. The government can nudge ordinary citizens towards protecting quality planet successfully. The masses are in the favor of conservation projects, they plough back money and their time into campaigns, which can be listed as an example. Furthermore, the state imposes strict environmental laws and has drastic measures. For instance, administrators can regulate and punish individuals who litter unconsciously by levying taxes as the act of a deterrent.
On the other hand, there is a testament for people who are of the great importance of preserving global quality. Individuals alter their lifestyles and raise their awareness about the unshaken importance of the environment. For example, most humans turn to use biodegradable products such as bamboo straws, especially people who tend to utilize carbon-free energy and sustainable sources of energy such as solar energy, hybrid vehicles, and the like. Effectively, eco-friendly stocks of products or utensils reign supreme, and individuals maintain their sustainable lifestyle choice.
To keep it in my perspective, it is undeniable that ecological balance is on the decline, and it engenders some valid concerns so that environmental preservation rest with not only administrators but also human beings.
To conclude, we must tackle the biological downplay. We should allot well-intentioned enterprises and endeavors to remedy them, which pushes for a greener future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | Nguyễn Văn Việt | 81 | view |
| 2022-03-23 | Han Duyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | aileean | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | dhruvik_patel | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | paula_ngy08 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 61
- Write about the following topic Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
In recent years, there are a host of issues like water contamination, ozo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63586956522 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33916422509 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5944577498 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188682056743 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514584625024 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406844515552 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084817927962 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449679349276 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.