Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Scientific achievements in farming are made daily, and without any gainsaying, it is also happening in the field of agriculture. Such development includes the manufacturing of agricultural produce and growing same in an artificial environment. This has generated a huge contention among those who support this and those who still believe in the established methods of farming. This essay will discuss these views and propound my stand on the issue.
Firstly, the advances seen in agricultural practices nowadays have gone in tremendous ways to alleviate hunger and even create more jobs for individuals. These progress, allows for modifications of a number of farm products, plants and products that can withstand adverse weather conditions. It also allows for food to be available all year round. However, this goes without saying that the genetically modified foods, may be harmful to health in the long run as there has not been a robust trial among humans. They are a recent phenomenon- a pointer to this fact is the edict banning margarine from meals being served in New York, after it was discovered that it offers no nutritional value!
On the other hand, established farming methods have existed and survived for as long as human civilization. This has sustained the human population over time. It has continually improved the way of life of those who practiced it and has also evolved over time. Sustainability is a key feature of this mode of agricultural practice, as it encourages the cycle of life sustenance. As noble as this method is, due to the shrinking resources available to till and a population bursting its seams alarmingly, it appears all agricultural scientists need to change there thinking caps!
On the whole, I will still pitch my tent with the traditional method of tilling the ground, despite this, we need to find ways to improve the efficiency of the method and communicate same to the agriculturists. Man needs to be health and fit and we will still be here for eons. Hence, we need not interfere with the homeostasis that made us up, transforming ourselves to guinea pigs, on account of the rat race.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- There are many different types of music in the world today. why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays ? 89
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 73
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school.How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws and propound my stand on the issue. Firstly, the advances seen in agricultur...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, still, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05070422535 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97073739975 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580281690141 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.9425907836 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.533333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727712262123 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256033391321 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267548500029 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468246856733 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425207581612 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.