Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The subject choice for university students is one of the most popular topics in today's world. While many people believe that students should be able to choose what subjects they want to learn, others often argue that science and technology should be prioritized as they are more useful in the future. In this essay, I will discuss both views and state my opinion at the end.
People who are in favor of letting students study whatever they enjoy often bring up a good point that different students have different strengths and personalities which are more suited to a specific field. University graduates who are well versed in their favorable fields will show greater advancement in life, earning better wages, landing jobs with higher positions, and be happier. This is because if you do the things that you like, you will never work a day in your life. Another good point is that subjects besides science and technology do have certain values. For example, literature will help us explore different emotions, improve communicative skills and aid us in becoming more aware of life itself; history will help us remember those that came before us, the ones that shaped the foundation of our society and preserve the historical and cultural values that define nations.
There are some who oppose this view; however, it is easy to understand their argument that students ought to learn science and technology because of the importance of these subjects. Science has always been the key to the creation of thousands of useful inventions that we now use in our daily life. Nowadays, it can be said that ingenuity engineering is vital to solving global problems such as overpopulation, climate change, global warming. Another point they usually mention is that science and technology will help students to develop useful skills such as problem-solving, critical thinking, lateral thinking which are beneficial in both work life and personal life.
In conclusion, it is by no means an easy task for everyone to determine which side of the argument they should take because both sides appear to prove their points. However, I personally believe that students should be able to choose what to learn as there are many ways to contribute to society, not just through science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 67
- Unemployment is one of the most serious problems facing developed nations today What are the advantages and or disadvantages of reducing the working week to thirty five hours 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0582010582 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59921409049 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55291005291 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1683847226 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378016152135 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113263936636 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854423458772 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230166764414 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959236160458 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.