The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001.
The disparity in the percentage of domestic car ownership is illustrated in the line chart, and, the data was taken in the Great Britain, from 1961 to 2001.
Generally, car might be not an affordable item in the 1960s then it was in the 2000s.
To be more specifically, in 1961, around 65% families did not have any car, about one third afforded to purchase one car, and no families owned two cars or more.
During the next 20 years period, there was a significant change in the car ownership percentage, with half of the domestic households surveyed possessed a car, and nearly 15% of those acquired two cars. In accompanied to that rate, the percentage of those without a car dropped rapidly to about 35%.
In 2001, there was a sharp increase in the number of families obtained two or more cars, which was just under 30%. The households with only one car still were recorded as the majority, but the proportion decreased slightly to approximately 43%, while that proportion who possessed no car continued to experience a downward trend. Such a rate was estimated as less than 30% in the same year.
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- There are more advertisements aiming at children. Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 81
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68459229992 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3521728298 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23799251403 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100083923166 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102941782013 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142509145711 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108889324344 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.