Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time. Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There are many conflicting views on housing construction. Some people think that houses need to be well built to last for a long time. However, others argue that this should be done as fast and cheaply as possible. In my opinion, these two factors are of equal importance.
The fact that some people support the concept of building a home with a structure certainly comes from a number of reasons, but the major one is safety and aesthetic value. A building being carefully and meticulously constructed from design to choice of materials means it has the ability to withstand natural disasters such as floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes. On the contrary, the sketchy construction will easily lead to the risk of collapse, meaning the possibility of a loss of people and things is very high. Vietnam is a prime example. During the historic flash flood a few years ago, most of the temporarily-built houses were swept away by the flood while the carefully built with high cost remained unaffected.
However, in some cases, affordable housing becomes an urgent and essential need. This stems from the benefits that low-cost housing projects bring to low-income people. Workers and manual laborers who cannot afford comfortable and expensive houses only need a place to return to after stressful working days. Therefore, a luxurious house with full amenities is considered a luxury for this audience. Another reason is that the rapid growth of the global population makes the demand for housing increase. If the construction industry cannot cope, the possibility of people living in homelessness or in slums is very high.
In summary, both of the above criteria should be carefully considered when building a house. A house should be built safely and at a reasonable cost to meet the needs of the growing population and those living in poverty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-04 | Vũ Phương Linh | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | Vũ Phương Linh | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | Vũ Phương Linh | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | Vũ Phương Linh | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | Vũ Phương Linh | 78 | view |
- People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past Do you agree or disagree 86
- The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000 2005 and 2010 The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Topic Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities towns and rural areas in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...rtainly comes from a number of reasons. but the main reason is safety and aesthetic...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04885993485 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74119282084 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0263748691 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5789473684 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213603397933 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589891274778 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066732939728 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142276321832 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843634334797 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.