Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that self-food production and independent of food imports are the activities to ensure national food security. While the benefits of this are irrefutable, I would contend that it might be impractical in many nations.
It is understandable why some people acknowledge that producing food their residents eat and importing less food are the foremost methods that each country had to do to enhance food security. Regarding the former, one rationale for this belief probably is that there is a strong correlation between unemployment rate and self-food production. Doing that will lead to an increase in agriculture-related jobs, thereby possibly curbing the unemployment rate. This can be seen in the rural area of VietNam where the agricultural sector has helped to ensure year-round production, created thousands of jobs for the locals, and prevented jobless periods. Furthermore, importing less food also has a favorable impact on the environment. This is due to the fact that this activity could help to reduce food miles, hence saving fossil fuels and also lower levels of air pollutants released from food transportation.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, producing food domestically is not feasible in many countries. This can be seen in case of some nations where its natural habitat makes it hard to produce enough food for their citizens. This can be evidenced by Japan, whose infertile soil and hostile climate are not suitable for agricultural practice. Another notable example can be seen in Angola, where food security is a major issue for a long time because of prolonged droughts. In such countries, importing food is the only way to ensure their national food security.
In conclusion, although reducing the food importing rate and increasing self production have many social and environmental benefits, it is not impractical for some countries where natural conditions afford people little choice. For this case, importing food is a must.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 71 | view |
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The picture below shows the process of producing ceramic pots Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table below shows the percentages ofthe population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...untries where natural conditions afford people little choice. For this case, importing...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, regarding, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36741214058 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03429616549 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5873932886 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304442658776 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121730523022 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106399785671 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199803582824 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496746346501 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...untries where natural conditions afford people little choice. For this case, importing...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, regarding, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36741214058 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03429616549 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5873932886 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304442658776 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121730523022 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106399785671 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199803582824 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496746346501 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.