Some people think that the government is wasting money on arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view ?
According to the statement, some individuals believe that legal authorities are wasted funds on arts or such exhibitions rather than to spend on another essential tasks which could prove to be better for country. It seems to me as complete disagreement with this notion and reasons are explained in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are numerous art exhibitions such as museums, art galleries and so on which plays major role in the development of a nation. Therefore, there is neither be wasted nor be useless to spend funds in arts. There are plethora of reasons which shows the necessity of arts. The first and foremost reason is, this criteria leads to inclination towards tourism. Because, every nation have their plenty of ancient museums and art galleries which contains lot of historical items and another tools which showa the attraction of tourists to visit there. Due to which, large proportion of visitors may visit from foreign countries due to these art exhibitions to notify them. Thus, they also need accomodation and transportation services. Therefore, they provide charges for these services and also checkout entry tickets with maximum charges. As a result, this become leads to economic progression of nation due to proliferation of tourism via these arts events.
Furthermore, the another factor is evidences of the historical events and culture of a nation. In this criteria, these galleries provided knowledge and boost out informative skills. Because, there are number of things which depicts the picture if history, ancient culture and tools which are preserved in these museums. There exhibitions attached the residents with their history of nation. Apart from that, these exhibitions of museums also become source of employment for numerous masses. Because, if tourists attraction inclines which leads to necessity of more count of staff in hotels for superior services and also guardmen to seek the items for their protection. Due to this, number of individuals become able to be employed on such posts as waiters or guardians. As a result, this also leads to the development of nation due to proliferation of employment.
To recapitulate, I personally consider that spending funds in arts is not concern towards wastage because this shows positive impacts on the development of nation such as tourism, employment and so on.
- Some people think that school children should learn to grow food as well as cook along with their lessons What is your opinion about it 67
- The bari graph below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subjects and gender during the period of 2010 2011 90
- Fast food is becoming one part of life everywhere this has bad effects on our lifestyle and diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries but it does not solve poverty So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arts. The first and foremost reason is, this criteria leads to inclination towards t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ical events and culture of a nation. In this criteria, these galleries provided know...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, apart from, as to, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28042328042 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83990488727 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5253860174 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145823401492 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487944109167 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415660919151 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107555284517 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043814318735 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.