Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
In the salad of millennium the society is polarised in to the groups almost equally regarding the notion that the acceleration of the trade between distinct nations is more advantageous while different people assert that it is the reason behind the national identity loss. The upcoming paragraphs would shed Light on both approaches before making a final note.
To commerce with the first notion there are myriad of things to be shared in the favour of the inclined business among the various countries. First and foremost, the increase business in distinct nations genrates the new job opportunities for the residents. As a result, the economy of the country will be inclined and the unemployability rate of the nation will be declined. Secondly,the multinational companies open around the world that rise the trade between the countries and stronger their relationship as well as it wider the range of the products for the local customers therefore people can easily access the international brands.
However, shifting towards the second school of thought,the cultural contact and trade among different regions became the reason behind the identity loss of the nations . Firstly, wearing similar clothes, eating similar food and using same language may demolish the individualality of a region. To justify my state of mind there is an epitome, English is become Lingua francea nowadays, plenty of nations using English language. By utilizing the same language may vanish the cultural diversity. Moreover, international business negatively affect the local trade. In this ultra modern epoch peeps particularly the youngsters opt the branded products rather than local no matter how much great quality they have and this scenario have side effects on the identity of a nation.
According to my point of view, the increment of international business is detrimental for the individualality of country however,it's advantages are more significant than its disadvantages.
Hammering the last nail, although the multination trade have multifarious merits that accelerate the economy of the countries, if the diversity of the culture is extinct that will never take back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...of the nation will be declined. Secondly,the multinational companies open around the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ing towards the second school of thought,the cultural contact and trade among differ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... behind the identity loss of the nations . Firstly, wearing similar clothes, eatin...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the increment of international business is detrimental for the individualality o...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , its
...r the individualality of country however,its advantages are more significant than it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45697329377 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95962259732 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6415343778 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.357142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180039201791 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541977003873 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367368798794 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857293331572 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364880292612 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.