Some people think that increasing business and cultural contacts worldwide have positive influences on development; other think that they have negative effects on national identities.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the effects which globalization exert. Some believe that globalization surely benefits most countries in different fields such as economy, education and politics; others however, insist that it is diluting national identities. In my view, globalization not only boosts economic development, but generally has positive effects on national identities.
Business contacts around the world contribute a lot to development. Investments from multinational companies create many job opportunities for local residents, and as a result, improve their living standards. That is the reason why many development countries enact policies to encourage international businesses and foreign investments.
Moreover, with globalized communication, national cultures and identities are more easily expressed to the outside world and receive the respect and appreciation. For example, the animated film “Kungfu Panda”, has become a blockbuster hit in many countries recently. Since Kungfu and Panda are uniquely two Chinese elements, Chinese identity has been enhanced and has impressed many people around the world through this film.
Those who harbour the view that cultural contacts may threaten national identities may argue that now the younger generations living in Shanghai eat hamburgers, drink coffee, work in skyscrapers and even speak English often, adapting a lifestyle similar to that of their western counterparts. But, I think this is just a universal modern lifestyle and to protect our national identity does not mean that every Chinese should drink tea everyday or use chopsticks every meal. In fact, the essence in our value system such as moderation mindset still remains unchanged.
In summary, increasing business and cultural contacts does play an important role in a country’s development. Meanwhile, a more prosperous economy facilitates the recognition and reservation of national culture and identity worldwide.
- Today there are more images of disasters and violence in the media What are the cause and what are your solutions 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compare with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 73
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowldege or experience 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situations such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ean that every Chinese should drink tea everyday or use chopsticks every meal. In fact, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, i think, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9375 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09905121632 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2577483105 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20585447228 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639828805511 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388591733799 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103213345879 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369206635016 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.