Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views.
It is believed that newspapers are the best methods of transffering information, while some people argue that obtaining knowledge from smart tools if more effective.
On the one hand, traditional press are more likely to contain guaranteed content. This is because they are written by professional journalists who are well-trained and extremely seasoned. Besides, heavy assessopm is also a requestment before publishing a newspaper. Therefore, readers can broaden their social insights, language proficiency, as well as be protected from misleading information.
On the other hand, an outstanding advantage of media learners is updatability. Head news are renewed every single minute in real-time. The reason for this is that, in technology era, electronic devices such as: smart phone, laptop, television ... are no longer strange to people and they even utilise them competently. Another reason is an article has likelihood to be compiled and typed directly on computer which is not as time-consuming as handwriting. For instance, COVID-19 pandemic enters new phase which is more serious and more complicated, each individual should foster a habit updating news every hour to raise awareness of self-protection as well as prevent contagious potential. As a result, knowledge on media is unlimited and it can provide for people acquaintance from cornerstone to sophisticate. Therefore, they tend to more confident to apply thie knowledge in practice.
In conclusion, while other people think that the press are the most beneficial information resourses for them, some feel that news from smart instruments are better means to gain knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-29 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | bnhi | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal journalists who are well-trained and extremely seasoned. Besides, heavy asses...
^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'those knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; those knowledges
...e, they tend to more confident to apply those knowledge in practice. In conclusion, while oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61044176707 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15069262227 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658634538153 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0056223347 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7857142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173066846253 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489104577568 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566540143599 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112476708211 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611193965068 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.