Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this
The future of society is in the hands of its youth, hence a concentrated effort to set the most ideal environment for them. This has lead to a discussion about whether the responsibility of aiding them on this journey of growing up should be left to the school or to the parents. This essay explores this topic and explains my enthusiasm for a hybrid approach.
On the one hand, schools have always been known to be the ultimate hub for learning, ever since the conception of society. It is no wonder why so many believe that this is where the sculpting and molding of a future citizen should begin. For one thing, schools have everything learners could ever need to be able to jumpstart their growth. From standardized learning materials, professional educators to scientifically designed timetables, all of these attributes aid in one’s journey of becoming the ideal individual. Furthermore, the enviroment schools provide, rich in social interaction, serves as a way for learners to practice building interpersonal relationship, a key step in becoming emotionally intelligent.
On the other hand, many have made the convincing notion that there are many benefits to letting parents take the wheel. To herald this argument, it should be established that home is the number one safe space for many youngsters. What this means is that the people within that safespace, i.e. the parents, have easy access to the process of development of the child. Vice versa, youths also find it more comfortable reaching out to their parents for guidance and counselling rather than a teacher, for instance. From there, the adults can adhere to the need of the young learner so they can thrive within the crucial early years. It is this ease of modification that proves incredibly compelling. Despite all of this, only when looking at the big picture can the true answer for the big argument in the opening arises; Both of these sources have their own advantages and shortcoming, but when combined, they form a rock-solid core in the assistance of development.
Overall, there are merits to the either the choice of allocating mentoring responsibility to parents or to schools, with both having an interweaving relationship. And as such, the best outcome in creating good citizens of the future world shall not be produced lest a hybrid approach inclusive of both mediums is properly implemented.
- Today s children are living under more pressure from the society than children in the past To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Write at least 350 words 89
- Write an essay of about 350 words on the following topic Many cities around the world are considering turning streets into car free zones which helps curb pollution and make people healthier However some people believe that cities will suffer once this be 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 84
- Virtual life on social media has become a parallel one with equal importance to the life in reality What causes the phenomenon and is this a positive change Write an essay of about 350 words to support your opinion and support your answer with relevant ex 84
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, thus, for instance, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06852791878 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92905387327 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3978582014 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179786002454 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056394376755 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368275685858 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104466987115 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293003996854 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, thus, for instance, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06852791878 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92905387327 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3978582014 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179786002454 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056394376755 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368275685858 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104466987115 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293003996854 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.