Some people think that robots are very important to human’s future development. Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society. Discuss both opinions and give your personal view.
The progress of artificial intelligence is undeniable and inevitable. However, whether it is a blessing or a curse in the future remains a controversial issue. In my own view, artificial intelligence, namely robots, is a double-edged sword for human beings and the question lies in how we can make use of it safely and properly.
On the one hand, a number of virtues can be gained via proper use of robots. To begin with, human beings can be relieved from dangerous and repetitive works by the replacement of robots. This will also have a significantly positive effect on social productivity, because robots usually make less mistakes when doing jobs requiring accuracy and are able to do them more quickly. Moreover, robots can also be used to enhance people’s life quality. For instance, they can take care of the old and offer help in their daily life, which tend to be quite practical and convenient.
On the other hand, the potential dangers of robots can not be neglected. The first possibility is that their replacement of human beings in workplaces will bring a higher unemployment rate. The more the bosses prefer to employ the mechanical people, the more people will be unemployed and the lower the living standard will become. More seriously, this will further lead to an unstable society. Meanwhile, if people in the future rely too much on robots, it is possible that human beings will lose the basic skills for living and even surviving. Then human civilization will be put in danger. Imagine that one day, all works are done by robots and what we have to do is lying in the bed and eating the food prepared by them -- How weird!
As I have discussed above, while robots can bring benefits to human development, their potential danger is inescapable. Therefore, it is important for us to set moral guidelines and law restrictions to prevent them from being overused or used inappropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | Sarabjit | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Ranjana thapa chhetri | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | shenu | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-23 | manhstorm | 89 | view |
| 2018-04-03 | Kaushik Patel | 91 | view |
- The older generations tend to have traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. Some people argue that these traditional ideas are not helpful in preparing the younger generations for modern life. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- Long distance flights use more fuels than cars and pollute the environment. We should discourage non-essential flights instead of limiting the use of the car. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 71
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skill needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course 71
- Do you think how important it is for people to want success in life ? Is ambition a positive or negative characteristic? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...oductivity, because robots usually make less mistakes when doing jobs requiring accu...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'for instance', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202739726027 0.247107183377 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.153424657534 0.155533422707 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115068493151 0.0946595960268 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0630136986301 0.0501214627716 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0438356164384 0.0437548338989 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109589041096 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0465753424658 0.0403226058552 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87766506269 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027397260274 0.0326793684256 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0821917808219 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0383561643836 0.021408717616 179% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013698630137 0.011925033212 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1916.0 1933.35771543 99% => OK
No of words: 325.0 316.048096192 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89538461538 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329230769231 0.374742101984 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230769230769 0.28420135186 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178461538462 0.203846283523 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126153846154 0.137316102897 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87766506269 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.037074148 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 62.2161501382 60.7387585426 102% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1176470588 20.7743622355 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0782107357 49.517814964 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.705882353 127.492653851 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7743622355 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.814263465372 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 42.1945701357 49.1944974215 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.37894736842 1.69124875643 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216145655106 0.332605444948 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0964137722196 0.102741220458 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0430582001733 0.0668466124924 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523822076885 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141307962316 0.148594505496 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852775710542 0.134430193775 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433378248082 0.0742795772207 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.270272674284 0.324371583561 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112743865388 0.0638462369009 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143004136421 0.228012699653 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336476699082 0.058150111329 58% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.