some people think that strict punishment for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others,however, believe that other measures could be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Road Safety has been a novel topic that attracts great attention in recent years. it is argued that commuting offenders are necessary to suffer strict penalization to curtail accident occurrences. Otherwise, some people advocate that road safety would be modified by taking other productive countermeasures. This essay aims to elaborate both views and express my opinion.
On the one hand people have their own reasons to emphasizing driving offences should be received punishment.First, is likely to promote safely driving habit among ordinary commuters because they would tend to avoid repeating the same mistakes and transport in precaution. Secondly, after observing other's compensation the whole innocent citizen will raise their awareness about driving skills. As a result, it contributes to shape the driving behavior of the entire Society.
On the other hand, applying their other formulations to regulate traffic problems should be taken into account. From my perspective, rather than forcing offenders to suffer punishment, it is advisable to educate them adequate knowledge about commuting safety. For instance, trainee need to have proficent experience in coping with different situation and recognizing accurately the complexity of road conditions before passing license test. In addition to this, the government had better invest on traffic transport system and other facilities such as stop lights, stop signs with a view to improving road conditions - a better proactive measures to protect people occupants.
In conclusion, as far as I concerned, before having severe penalization for offensive driver, the government should consider to take some methods to boost road user's knowledge of rules or defence driving skills to combat against traffic accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Minhthuminhthumingthu | 73 | view |
- some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.discuss both views and your opinion. 78
- in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem 56
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2002 and 2013.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Spend finance on art 56
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both vi 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tracts great attention in recent years. it is argued that commuting offenders are ...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
... offences should be received punishment.First, is likely to promote safely driving ha...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erned, before having severe penalization for offensive driver, the government sho...
^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider taking'.
Suggestion: consider taking
...offensive driver, the government should consider to take some methods to boost road users knowle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...ider to take some methods to boost road users knowledge of rules or defence driving s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72452830189 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94681452905 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675471698113 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4318586097 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241882141101 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742484834809 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419149565352 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1309829378 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195086363875 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.