Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old
buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a current belief among the general public that historical architecture should be demolished instead of conserved because too much finance has been invested in maintaining these constructions. Although I somewhat agree that keeping these sites may be harmful to the safety of the residents, I still believe that the merits of historical building maintenance outweigh the drawbacks for the economic development that they bring to a country.
Firstly, old buildings are usually considered historical witnesses and their cultural values are long-winded. It is obvious that keeping these structures helps countries to attract many tourists every year as the visitors tend to contemplate the beauty and history of the buildings. Hence, by having these buildings, a nation financially benefits from tourism to develop its economy. The Immaculate Conception Cathedral Basilica, which is located in Vietnam, is a clear illustration of my idea. It is also being repaired and is still a well-known tourist destination that brings many profits to the people of this city.
Besides, keeping the historical sites is a great methodology to educate the young generations about patriotic spirit. As young learners usually visit museums on school trips, they tend to take pride in their race because of understanding the values hidden in the constructions.
However, there are some instances when historical constructions may threaten the safety of the public. Being built decades ago, it is common for these historical heritages to be damaged by natural conditions. Consequently, the damages may put the safety of local people at risk. For example, cracked walls of the sites may lead to the collapse of these constructions, which may cause serious loss to the locals.
In conclusion, although I partially agree that keeping historic buildings should be knocked down for safety, I still believe that the old buildings should be maintained for all of the benefits which they bring to us, including economic development and patriotism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nunu | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
There is a current belief among the general public that historical architecture should be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 174, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... old buildings should be maintained for all of the benefits which they bring to us, includ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, may, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43670886076 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99353707518 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5526960715 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141743098309 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441315166492 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620675307729 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847560904666 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753389985831 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.