Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that governments are spending more money than necessary to maintain old buildings in good conditions, and that knocking them down entirely and building new ones is more budget-friendly. In my opinion, there is little to agree with such a thought, and the reasons behind that are going to be expounded in this essay.
Firstly, old buildings have remarkable historical and artistic values, which is the main reason why money is being poured into the work of repairing them. Many establishments have been proved to be the results of years of hard work of well-known artistic historical figures, making them irreplaceable masterpieces that represent certain periods of history. Those are factors that no modern building can contain. Some renowned examples are the Colosseum and the Pisa Tower - admirable artistic structures with hundreds of years in age and world-wide reputation.
Secondly, as a result of cultural values stated above, many old buildings have become effective tourist attractions. These artificial historical sites are usually visitors’ all-time favorite destinations, bringing back economic benefits by selling tickets and creating job opportunities for locals. Therefore, the amount of money spent in the process of preserving and repairing can be easily paid back. I believe that it is not exaggerating to say that those establishments have proved themselves to be some sort of profitable investment.
In conclusion, I believe that old buildings have irreplaceable cultural values that no modern ones can consist, and the amount of money spent on repairing them is not only necessary but also profitable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nunu | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 84
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically As a result some people believe that non academic subjects such as physical education and cookery should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on acade 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, sort of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06867007995 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8755052667 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.090909091 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250623033527 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944088593858 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813646486967 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165694506455 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046406454944 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, sort of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06867007995 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8755052667 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.090909091 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250623033527 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944088593858 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813646486967 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165694506455 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046406454944 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.