Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In recent times, education online and offline has been widely debated in many parts of the world. While it is believed that learning online would bring more effective benefits than traditional education does, I still hold my opinion that studying with face-to-face communication in schools would give more positive impacts on conveying knowledge and other skills.
On the one hand, traditional education with small groups of children might create better quality in both methods of teaching and management than online studying. When it comes to face-to-face education, educators can easily communicate with pupils and also transfer acknowledgement to children. Hardly students feel distant from their teachers, they can actively ask instructors to assist when facing problems in their lessons. Besides, the management of schools where educators traditionally teach their pupils might be easier than ones with systems of online education. According to a survey of the press in Vietnam, the rate of students passing the final examination of the primary school was lower than in previous years, when the authority applied the educational system online because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
On the other hand, face-to-face studying would bring a convenient environment for children to develop soft skills, such as communication, solving problems, team-working, and so on. For example, pupils can face a difficult task in class, they can find out answers with their teams , while online education can not clearly bring an opportunity for students to solve problems together. As a result, those skills not only lead to a loyalty in their class but also create a favour in later life when they grow up and work in society. By studying traditionally, children can avoid using technological equipment which has negative impacts on children. Online education creates a condition for employment with computers or cell phones, which makes their parents difficult to control.
In conclusion, by the reasons given in this essay, I suggest that traditional education might have a more effective influence on teaching, management quality and development of social skills than online one.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-17 nhub2409785 56 view
2023-12-30 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-09-08 hinhin411 56 view
2023-08-16 hunghoang 61 view
2023-07-07 quoctoan@ 78 view
Essays by user Lunar Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Hardly' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...o transfer acknowledgement to children. Hardly students feel distant from their teache...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey can find out answers with their teams , while online education can not clearly ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48358208955 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9036745989 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585074626866 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7925205249 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150588965824 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573139187566 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373016504662 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100295287178 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213969473311 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.