Some say that reading newspapers and watching TV news is a waste of time because it has no direct connection with people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree

Reading newspaper and watching TV News by some people is said a wasting time as it does not connect to human life. I disagree as it is not truly right. Watching and reading news is obviously needed and it has correlation to people’s life.

It has been for one year, we are always listened to e news about corona virus. Firstly, this virus appears in China, and nobody might predict that this virus will spread to many other countries around the world. Without reading or watching news, people will not get to know about this and how to prevent it. So, the possibility to be contracted is big and can cause death. But by following news, people know how to save their life from the virus and what to do to stay safe. Therefore, it is clear that watching and reading news is not wasting time, however it is necessary for our mind and daily life.

In addition, news mostly reports about economy situation. It explains the fluctuation price of goods sold in the market. It is an essential thing to know by society, so they can manage their financial. Sometimes we do not know that any product that we usually bought is cheap but suddenly the price is going up, especially for primary product that mostly bought such as rice, egg, oil, fish, meat, vegetables, fruits and many other things. Having known this news earlier is helping people to manage their financial wisely, so they can prevent spending much money to meet their daily need.

In my conclusion, it is not right that watching and reading news is a waste of time, however it is necessary, so, people can prevent a bad impact that will happen in social life.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60689655172 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31747740998 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4762210242 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248014998724 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936741971967 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106698649462 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189053594796 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122597643459 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.