Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this
a positive development or a negative one?
In most schools around the world, students have their own mobile
phones. While these devices can undoubtedly play a role in safety,
connectedness and even learning, many schools have chosen to restrict
their use on campus. In my view, this is a positive step and can bring
benefits not only academically but physically and socially too.
Restricting phone use in the classroom itself can improve learning. This
is simply because, without these devices, there are far fewer distractions
for teachers and students. When a student has their phone in their lap or
pocket, for instance, there is an irresistible urge to check constantly for
texts, alerts or social media updates. Even the most observant teacher
cannot prevent them from sneakily checking their messages or scrolling
through this irrelevant material during the lesson. These endless
distractions draw attention away from important educational matters and
erode attention spans, which can have long-term effects on academic
progress. A blanket ban on phones during class frees learners from this
compulsive checking and allows them to focus.
In addition to banning phones in the classroom, a school that restricts
their use outside class can also expect improvements in student
well-being. Indeed, if phones are banned at lunchtime and recess,
children are forced to engage in a more meaningful and perhaps active
way with their classmates. They may play games, sports or simply sit
and chat together, activities which are far healthier than sitting alone
hunched over a screen. Without limitations enforced by the school,
children simply cannot draw the line on their phone use. These social
and physical benefits are only possible with strict mobile rules.
In conclusion, although phones are a part of our modern lives, I strongly
feel that their use in schools should be limited. With firm boundaries and
bans in some situations, students are able to learn better, strengthen
friendships and engage in healthier pursuits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | ImranMurtaza | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-10 | Revivo Tulaseket | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | teenieteens | 73 | view |
- Studies show that crime rates are lower among those with educational degrees Therefore the best way to reduce the crime rate is to educate criminals while they are still in prison Do you agree or disagree 84
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Whether or not a person achieve their aims in life is mostly related to Luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 28, column 53, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... situations, students are able to learn better, strengthen friendships and engage in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49681528662 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67338430654 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6661663886 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 29.0 4.38176352705 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256252498451 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858406952862 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586326426001 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606068073273 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707354090166 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.