Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a possitive development or a negative one?
Restriction at bringing phone in schools can have various impacts. Many countries have banned the use of gadgets at school. I think this is a negative impact on literary development and student’s security.
Less acces to the phone reduce its benefit for learning. As it is generally known, gadgets can access the internet. Through this search engine, phones will have limitless source on various topic helping student to have broad understanding on variety of subjects. Meanwhile, there are different kinds of learners. For instance, audio-visual learner prefer to learn based on videos or movies. This problem cannot be solved by conventional method using human. Therefore, mobile phones is necessary to fill this gap, the incapability of teacher. As a result, wider disccusion may occur in the classroom because mobile phones assist lecturers to teach the learners. Thus, banning mobile phones in the class is negative.
Furthermore, mobile phone is used by students to communicate with parents after school. When children have already finished school hours, they tend to call their parents to pick them up way to home. Likewise, phones is a tool for parents to suprvise their children whenever they are. If they had no cell phone, they would lose contact with their parents. Indeed, this phenomenon lead to abduction in many cases. The more gadgets restrictions are applied, the higher the risk of children abduction is.
To sum up, I personally agree that banning mobile phones is a hughe disadvantage because it lessens the effectiveness of phones and jeopardizes students’ lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ious impacts. Many countries have banned the use of gadgets at school. I think th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, as a result, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78631737222 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6393551352 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6315789474 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3157894737 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366373282579 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101641729936 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733568104637 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221595813199 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091743920725 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.57 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.