Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

In term of higher education, the priority between specialised knowlegde and broad-based education is often debated. While some university student advocate for diversifying their learning experience with wide range of subjects, others argue in favor of complete attention for their chosen field of study to gain a specific qualification. This follwing essay will explore both these stances before offering an inform opinion.
The first group of students, eager to broaden their academic horizon. They are believe that university’s purpose is to foster well-rounded individuals with a breadth of knowledge across various domains. This approach allows them to gain new perspective, encourage intellectual flexibility, and enhances their critical thinking skills, To show you what I mean, a student majoring in engineering who also studies philosophy might develop critical thinking skills that can be applied creatively to engineering challenges. Furthermore, interdisciplinary knowledge often leads to innovate breakthroughs, as seen in fields like environmental economics or bioniformatics.
Contrastingly, other students prefer to devote their full attention to their main qualification. Specialization enables a student to gain profound expertise in their field, enhancing their competence and marketability. A prime example is the field of healthcare where precision and deep knowledge are indispensable. Heart surgenos, for instance, undergo intensive, focusing on training cardiovascular procedures and techniques to ensure they can provide the highest level of care, significantly reducing the risk of surgical complications. Thus, certaiin fields necessitate a focused approach, rather than a broad, general overview.
In conclusion, while specialised qualification are undoubtedly important, I firmly believe that a well- rounded education that encompasses a breadth of subjects can provide the most value in the long run, producing versatile, innovative needed to excel in an increasing a complex world.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-07 Tường Vân 84 view
2024-03-21 MinyiChu 61 view
2024-03-21 MinyiChu 56 view
2024-03-18 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-03-08 Nina Tsarevich 73 view
Essays by user tran quynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... of complete attention for their chosen field of study to gain a specific qualificati...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lore both these stances before offering an inform opinion. The first group of students,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...roaden their academic horizon. They are believe that university’s purpose is to foster ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i mean, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10915492958 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42172909709 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68661971831 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4461446777 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.461538462 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239231618408 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736528379678 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08712375143 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130383759685 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656382107036 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.