In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Witnessing the advancement in agricultural techniques It is yet to indicate that there will be more countries on the earth with less famine. Personally, the reasons behind this misery may lie on the ongoing demand and supply imbalances in agricultural products and the obstacles in the transportation. Nonetheless, these problems can probably be mitigated by educating the agriculturists better transportation and more collective efforts by the countries and organizations.
Regarding the reasons, although the cultivation sectors of agrarian countries gained significant improvement with the increasing volumes of product, it does not necessarily translate that such shift will be successfully coping with the scarcity of food resources in several areas of the world. The demands are not having a substantial decline and yet, the coverage of the food supply is still far from global scale. In addition, the ease of transportation facilitates the commodity transfer service. Thus, without paying attention to the infrastructure development such as roads or railways, contribution to the people with hunger will be below potential albeit the reasonable developments in the agricultural sector.
As for the solutions, educating the farmer community has always been the effective approach which only needs to further its focus towards the farmers in countries with more agricultural-related challenges in terms of weather or location. The governments of countries with people in starvation should also prioritize infrastructure development alongside with the first suggestion. Moreover, more collaboration in counties with international organizations and more coordination with regional or global associations through conventions, blueprints and agreements, will further ensure more people and regions out of starvation.
To sum up, the inadequate support of food. products and the challenging aspects of transportation play as the reasons behind the stated problem. By effectively developing the agriculture and infrastructure, the global issue of hunger will get diminished with the joint effort of countries and global organizations.
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Products
...sum up, the inadequate support of food. products and the challenging aspects of transpor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, thus, as for, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98376623377 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51756759007 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6318786218 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.769230769 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112678298242 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410474850601 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312536589627 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742085723737 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486390644196 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.