In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem ?
In today's modern era, more technology and genetical modification has become in the agriculture field. But even after making more advancement in agriculture, still there are number of masses around the whole world which are going hungry. There are several reasons behind this and also various ways by which this problem can be overcome. Both the reasons and solutions are discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are plethora of reasons which identify the population of those people which are going hungry. First of all, the major behind this criteria is overpopulation. As population is increasing rapidly day by day, more population means more maximum amount of food production is needed. But there is lack of food production and that also leads to price rise. As a result, this leads to hunger especially for those people who are under poverty line. They cannot afford it easily. Moreover, natural phenomenon such as flood and drought and so on also leads to scarcity of food. In this situation, the fields or crops of farmers do not harvest. For instance, due to drought, there become lack of water so the crops do not cultivate which results in deficiency in food production.
Apart from that, there are also numerous ways to overcome this problem. Firstly, government can play major role in this. Legal authorities can start some schemes and programmes to give food to those people which go hungry. For instance, legal authorities can give pulses, rice and so on after every month to poor people by which they can overcome the problem of hunger and food scarcity. In addition, if legal communities reduce the prices of some common food products such as pulses, rice and wheat floor, then it will become easy to afford for those people who live under poverty line and go hungry mostly everyday.
To conclude, I think that there are plethora of reasons which causes the problem of hungerness such as overpopulation and price rice. However, there are also major ways to overcome this problem.
- Some people think it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The increase in people life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start work at younger age Is this alternative positive or negative statement 56
- People buy a product if it fullfills their need there is no need for advertisement To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- In some societies the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing Some people think that regardless of age teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishments To what extent do you agree 73
- There aren t many houses to accommodate people so it has several social consequences Only the government can solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... hungry. First of all, the major behind this criteria is overpopulation. As populati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...under poverty line and go hungry mostly everyday. To conclude, I think that there are p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, apart from, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9674556213 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54552918808 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.293876552 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.95 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224346626688 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716764181655 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638019116296 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150157586293 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611121559815 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... hungry. First of all, the major behind this criteria is overpopulation. As populati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...under poverty line and go hungry mostly everyday. To conclude, I think that there are p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, apart from, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9674556213 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54552918808 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.293876552 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.95 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224346626688 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716764181655 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638019116296 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150157586293 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611121559815 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.