In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem

In this day and age, it is undeniable that the agriculture world is developed, however, there is still a plenty of people now suffereing from starvation. This essay will discuss the reasons related to this dilemma and finally provide my solutions to tackle this issue.

There are several reasons to explain the hunger of citizens in this developed era. To begin, it is the fact that new technologies only come to developed countries instead of all regions. It means that people who live in a breadline still have nothing to fulfill their stomaches. People will lose energy even if there is an improvement in agriculture as a result of food lacked in some places. For instance, residents in highes location of Vietnam always go hundry because the difficulties in transporting food. Furthermore, we cannot deny that homeless cases do not receive adequate sources of food every single day, so, it leads to their hunger.

However, solutions to handle this problem are still exist and they are completely depend on human actions. Wealthy households should give the impverished ones things to eat to live gradually. For example, there are now abundant of non-profit charities to provide food for unfortunate cases. The increase of charities will correlate to the decline of needy citizens. Moreover, more transported system should be erected in order to acess and deliver nourishment to people in remote areas. Thus, the amount of hungers will be merely reduced. Last but not least, modern tools and technological equipments might be expanded because it allows people to harvest more crops in higher quality. In addtion, this method will consequence significantly.

To conclude, having mentioned the causes and solutions, I strongly believe that in the next few decades, the data of hungers will be at the lowest number.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...utions to handle this problem are still exist and they are completely depend on human...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...are still exist and they are completely depend on human actions. Wealthy households sh...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... households should give the impverished ones things to eat to live gradually. For ex...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16216216216 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77392639423 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0099176225 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8823529412 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216742923288 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612689123187 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569622249186 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125629466975 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787119953799 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.