Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person. Why do you think this is the case? What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
This day and age witnesses a significant increase in the youngsters, who are engrossed in online communication. This essay discusses some noticeable reasons and proposes solutions.
There are two fundamental factors responsible for disinterest in face-to-face meetings. First, it is due to the explosion of the internet especially social media. In particular, the mushrooming of social networking sites and chatting apps such as Facebook, Messenger, Viber, skype allows people to exchange information, send pictures and share their stories and everything in daily life anytime anywhere with a huge amount of people interacting. Besides, the youth are equipped with state-of-the-art gadgets to access the internet without restriction and become addicted to it. Second, the teenagers do not gain adequate necessary education about the detrimental effects caused by abusing online chatting and the irreplaceable roles of person in-person meetings.
However, there are solutions to alleviate these problems. To encourage the young to spend more time meeting in person, adults should organize more appealing, creative outdoor activities and encourage their children to partake. Schools can invite them to join beneficial conferences mentioning their top list of concerns to stimulate their curiosity such as gender, love, travel, mysterious events, career path, in which a lot of people are gathered to share and give their talks. Furthermore, dealing with this issue requires intertwined cooperation between parents and schools. Teenagers should be educated to realize the implications of excessive online interaction and the dramatic perks of meeting in person.
In conclusion, the main problems stem from the outbreak of the social network and the lack of knowledge about the negative impacts as well as the necessity of meeting physically. To solve these, parents, teachers should have radical actions to inspire the youngster to take part in meeting in person.
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many nations it is evident that there is an increasing disinterest in science subjects This essay discusses some remarkable reasons and their impacts regarding this alarming rate 56
- Some people say that boys and girls should study in separate schools while some say that mixed schools are better What is your opinion Give reasons and examples for your answer 92
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires intertwined" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'intertwining' or 'to be intertwined'.
Suggestion: intertwining; to be intertwined
...rmore, dealing with this issue requires intertwined cooperation between parents and schools...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69047619048 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99370937178 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5297352753 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231269880233 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684267074253 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660107563273 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120909359144 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413085197567 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.