Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case

Essay topics:

Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.

Why do you think this is the case?

With the thriving of technology, people nowadays have no need to go out for talking or getting to know each other, a smartphone can solve all these things regardless of how far you all are. Teenagers are said to prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. To my mind, this is kind of the case, I do not completely support this way of getting to know people.
I will start by saying that stuff like social media, finding friends apps,... are just a means of helping people out communicating with others in an easy and convenient way. And they are not totally real, people just literally sit there in their house and talk to their phone. There are no physical activities like eye contact or hand gestures, which are proved to be very important to get humans closer.
Another thing I would like to mention is the way we express our genuine feelings and real traits. We can not really know each other’s personality traits when we hide ourselves behind the screen, human beings are inclined to give out the best of them and make attempts to cover the ugly side, which can lead to disappointment once people meet one another in person.
Last but not least, socialising online can be very dangerous if we do not raise enough awareness. You can not even know if the person you are chatting with really wants to make friends. Many bad guys nowadays leverage the internet as a tool to approach their targets. They can be very nice and sweet talk at first, and once you are really into and trust them, they could make you do whatever they tell you to do, and take advantage of you.
In conclusion, internet is a very good way to get to know new friends, but every token has two sides, do not trust everything you see on this base, there could be a whole set of awful things that you can not imagine under that screen.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-10 ktoan 56 view
2023-07-22 tharooo 78 view
2023-07-20 dooxeiy 89 view
2023-07-01 tieuquynh 89 view
2023-06-27 huyeen 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... like social media, finding friends apps,... are just a means of helping people ou...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, another thing, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48203592814 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33992523355 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4660338653 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235020810019 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882160160269 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114754669542 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127533991526 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941414208461 0.056905535591 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.